Clearly the dial is a different style to the first and it has a different crown but in all other respects it is identical. The serial number however is over 100,000 higher, so presumably quite a bit later.
I don't know at what point plastic glasses began to be used but the one fitted here very closely matches the curve of the case so I'd like to think that it may be the original.
The case is again some alloy I can't identify but there is quite a lot more of the original surface left than on the other. It looks very much like gilt.
This crown is ridiculously fiddly to wind. It looks slightly better than the other version but it no where near as practical. I don't know if it's original or not, but I have seen other watches about this age with this slim style.
Update 15/08/2012 - I took this apart to clean it. Unfortunately it's been used as a practice piece I think and the movement is covered in scratches and full of gunk. For reasons I can't see the teeth in one quarter of the centre wheel are very worn. Perhaps something was stuck in there once? One of the banking pins is also bent. It's amazing it's keeping as good a time as it is!
Update 6/09/2012 - Cleaned, re-glassed and re-lumed. The lume on the dial must have been printed on. As soon as I can work out a way to do that I will.
Update 10/04/2014 - I recently acquired a watch timing machine and properly adjusted this watch. More by luck than judgement I'm sure but it now keeps time to within a few seconds a week being worn daily. I am astonished that a watch that is nearly 100 years old and (as far as I know) has had no major work carried out on it is capable of such accuracy and consistency. This movement is noticeably better finished than most of the watches I own, eg the winding wheels are polished to a mirror finish and the whole movement is gilted, so I assume this is one of the higher end models of the period. I'm very impressed.

No comments:
Post a Comment